Local languages essential for remote indigenous education
LOCAL Aboriginal education leaders, non-local leaders, and community members have agreed that teaching local languages are essential for remote indigenous education.
A study, led by Dr John Guenther of the Batchelor Institute, drew on over 770 responses from these three groups.
The groups had different priorities, but all agreed it was important to have local language Aboriginal teachers.
The findings are timely for the North Burnett as elders of the Wakka Wakka tribe meet in Eidsvold today to discuss the future of Indigenous language.
Eidsvold State School has been recognised on a state level for their language program and staff.
While state and federal policy documents widely present community engagement as important for remote Indigenous education, bilingual or first language education has not been prioritised in recent years.
"One of the main challenges for education systems wanting to pursue first language teaching is finding enough qualified teachers to do this,” Dr Guenther said.
"But this is exactly why having a well-trained local workforce is so important-local educators not only speak local languages but they know their community.”
Other areas of partial agreement included the importance of ESL and multilingual learning, which was highlighted by both local Aboriginal and non-local leaders.
Aboriginal education leaders and community members agreed on the importance of identity, parent and community involvement, and language, land and culture.
They thought it was important to be "strong in both worlds” - to both deepen connections to local culture and succeed in Australia's wider education system.
"We believe that our children are happier learning first in their own language. They have more confidence in learning, in themselves and they learn more effectively,” one local Aboriginal leader said..
But non-local leaders' priorities rarely aligned with those of remote Aboriginal communities.
These leaders were most often concerned with systemic issues, such as employment strategies, policy and political contexts, measurable outcomes, workforce development and issues of race and equity.
Dr Guenther said this was due to the demands placed on them by the education system: these non-local leaders grappled with tension between the desires of local communities and the issues they had to report on to education authorities.
"However, non-local leaders, who have grown up with urban expectations of schooling, will naturally be more comfortable working with a system they know well,” Dr Guenther said.
"The tension is more acute for local Aboriginal school leaders, who are caught in the middle between these two worlds.”
Community members had priorities which were "not high on the list of important concerns for either non-local leaders or remote Aboriginal leaders”, such as academic outcomes, health and wellbeing and relationships.
Dr Guenther said many education leaders at "red dirt” schools are doing a great job, but are placed in a difficult position.
"The evidence shown here may suggest that system priorities about what matters and what communities think matters are largely mutually exclusive with very little overlap,” he said.
"Local Aboriginal leaders may act as a bridge or a broker between the two, but there is only so much they can do.”
He and his co-author, Dr Sam Osborne of the University of South Australia, call for action on the one thing that all groups agreed on: the need for first language local Aboriginal educators in schools.
"Each group recognised the value of recruiting and training local staff. They were seen as important vehicles for successful education delivery,” Dr Osborne said.
"On the one hand, they can (and do) deliver better outcomes for attendance and academic achievement, and on the other they are a vital source for building aspiration and cultural and educational capacity within communities.”
The authors also suggest several accountability measures that could help bring community and policy priorities closer to alignment, such as employment of local staff, local involvement in school councils and community involvement in schools.
Education leaders in the study included principals, assistant principals, regional directors, union leaders, and bureaucrats with leadership roles in education.
Non-local leaders included both Aboriginal and non-Indigenous respondents from outside the remote context.
More information to follow on the meeting at Eidsvold.